Welcome aboard kid /u/copperdoc People Person’s Paper People

Welcome aboard kid /u/copperdoc People Person’s Paper People

Welcome aboard kid /u/copperdoc People Person’s Paper People

Welcome aboard kid

Saw the McDonald’s pic in “thewaywewere” sub. Had to laugh

submitted by /u/copperdoc
[link] [comments]

​r/DunderMifflin Saw the McDonald’s pic in “thewaywewere” sub. Had to laugh submitted by /u/copperdoc [link] [comments] 

Welcome aboard kid

Saw the McDonald’s pic in “thewaywewere” sub. Had to laugh

submitted by /u/copperdoc
[link] [comments]

  Saw the McDonald’s pic in “thewaywewere” sub. Had to laugh submitted by /u/copperdoc [link] [comments]

Read more

People may not agree with what i am going to say, but Andy is a genius exactly like Michael. /u/sanket_joice People Person’s Paper People

People may not agree with what i am going to say, but Andy is a genius exactly like Michael. /u/sanket_joice People Person’s Paper People

I have been rewatching the show for the 7th time and i just noticed how well Andy manages the office as the branch manager. I know hes not as lively and funny as michael but HE IS. The way he handles his employees in tense situations by being funny or doing something goofy. Thats exactly how michael was.

I was just watching the episode where andy is fired by Robert California and how andy goes back to david wallace to get a deal with him. This scenario is somewhat very similar to how michael got back his position as the manager. He may have started his own paper company and his efforts may have been more than Andy’s but andy just needed one opportunity.

I just wanted to say they’re both geniuses. Dont mind me, i just wanted to share my thoughts on this because i dont see how not many people talk about how well they both handle the office.

Thanks! Ciao

submitted by /u/sanket_joice
[link] [comments]

​r/DunderMifflin I have been rewatching the show for the 7th time and i just noticed how well Andy manages the office as the branch manager. I know hes not as lively and funny as michael but HE IS. The way he handles his employees in tense situations by being funny or doing something goofy. Thats exactly how michael was. I was just watching the episode where andy is fired by Robert California and how andy goes back to david wallace to get a deal with him. This scenario is somewhat very similar to how michael got back his position as the manager. He may have started his own paper company and his efforts may have been more than Andy’s but andy just needed one opportunity. I just wanted to say they’re both geniuses. Dont mind me, i just wanted to share my thoughts on this because i dont see how not many people talk about how well they both handle the office. Thanks! Ciao submitted by /u/sanket_joice [link] [comments] 

I have been rewatching the show for the 7th time and i just noticed how well Andy manages the office as the branch manager. I know hes not as lively and funny as michael but HE IS. The way he handles his employees in tense situations by being funny or doing something goofy. Thats exactly how michael was.

I was just watching the episode where andy is fired by Robert California and how andy goes back to david wallace to get a deal with him. This scenario is somewhat very similar to how michael got back his position as the manager. He may have started his own paper company and his efforts may have been more than Andy’s but andy just needed one opportunity.

I just wanted to say they’re both geniuses. Dont mind me, i just wanted to share my thoughts on this because i dont see how not many people talk about how well they both handle the office.

Thanks! Ciao

submitted by /u/sanket_joice
[link] [comments]  I have been rewatching the show for the 7th time and i just noticed how well Andy manages the office as the branch manager. I know hes not as lively and funny as michael but HE IS. The way he handles his employees in tense situations by being funny or doing something goofy. Thats exactly how michael was. I was just watching the episode where andy is fired by Robert California and how andy goes back to david wallace to get a deal with him. This scenario is somewhat very similar to how michael got back his position as the manager. He may have started his own paper company and his efforts may have been more than Andy’s but andy just needed one opportunity. I just wanted to say they’re both geniuses. Dont mind me, i just wanted to share my thoughts on this because i dont see how not many people talk about how well they both handle the office. Thanks! Ciao submitted by /u/sanket_joice [link] [comments]

Read more

Michael Scott’s Business Idea… or Why He Should Never Be in Charge of Finances /u/genesispa1 People Person’s Paper People

Michael Scott’s Business Idea… or Why He Should Never Be in Charge of Finances /u/genesispa1 People Person’s Paper People

So Michael Scott once said, “I am running a business, and it is a great business. I make great decisions. You guys make good decisions too. But I am always gonna be in charge. Always!”

Then he goes and opens a “Dundie Awards” box to fund the company’s annual Christmas party

Michael, buddy, we get it, but maybe try using that world-class business mind for actual revenue-generating ideas instead of handing out trophies to people for “Best Mom Jeans” or “Best [Blank] on the Block”??

I think we can all agree, as much as we love him, Michael Scott running the show is the reason Dwight is probably secretly tracking every penny. 😂

What’s the worst (or best?) “Michael Scott business decision” you’ve seen?

submitted by /u/genesispa1
[link] [comments]

​r/DunderMifflin So Michael Scott once said, “I am running a business, and it is a great business. I make great decisions. You guys make good decisions too. But I am always gonna be in charge. Always!” Then he goes and opens a “Dundie Awards” box to fund the company’s annual Christmas party… Michael, buddy, we get it, but maybe try using that world-class business mind for actual revenue-generating ideas instead of handing out trophies to people for “Best Mom Jeans” or “Best [Blank] on the Block”?? I think we can all agree, as much as we love him, Michael Scott running the show is the reason Dwight is probably secretly tracking every penny. 😂 What’s the worst (or best?) “Michael Scott business decision” you’ve seen? submitted by /u/genesispa1 [link] [comments] 

So Michael Scott once said, “I am running a business, and it is a great business. I make great decisions. You guys make good decisions too. But I am always gonna be in charge. Always!”

Then he goes and opens a “Dundie Awards” box to fund the company’s annual Christmas party

Michael, buddy, we get it, but maybe try using that world-class business mind for actual revenue-generating ideas instead of handing out trophies to people for “Best Mom Jeans” or “Best [Blank] on the Block”??

I think we can all agree, as much as we love him, Michael Scott running the show is the reason Dwight is probably secretly tracking every penny. 😂

What’s the worst (or best?) “Michael Scott business decision” you’ve seen?

submitted by /u/genesispa1
[link] [comments]  So Michael Scott once said, “I am running a business, and it is a great business. I make great decisions. You guys make good decisions too. But I am always gonna be in charge. Always!” Then he goes and opens a “Dundie Awards” box to fund the company’s annual Christmas party… Michael, buddy, we get it, but maybe try using that world-class business mind for actual revenue-generating ideas instead of handing out trophies to people for “Best Mom Jeans” or “Best [Blank] on the Block”?? I think we can all agree, as much as we love him, Michael Scott running the show is the reason Dwight is probably secretly tracking every penny. 😂 What’s the worst (or best?) “Michael Scott business decision” you’ve seen? submitted by /u/genesispa1 [link] [comments]

Read more

season 8 super fan!! /u/redrumredrum13 People Person’s Paper People

season 8 super fan!! /u/redrumredrum13 People Person’s Paper People

how is everyone liking the new season???? I didn’t know when it was gonna be out but I saw it the other day and I’m stoked!! this is the closest I can get to watching the show for the first time. it’s awesome. also side note- does anyone else just watch the whole series of the plain office then switch to superfans when that’s over then go back???? my boyfriend thinks I’m crazy for it haha but it’s my comfort show as I’m sure it is most of us here too lmfao

submitted by /u/redrumredrum13
[link] [comments]

​r/DunderMifflin how is everyone liking the new season???? I didn’t know when it was gonna be out but I saw it the other day and I’m stoked!! this is the closest I can get to watching the show for the first time. it’s awesome. also side note- does anyone else just watch the whole series of the plain office then switch to superfans when that’s over then go back???? my boyfriend thinks I’m crazy for it haha but it’s my comfort show as I’m sure it is most of us here too lmfao submitted by /u/redrumredrum13 [link] [comments] 

how is everyone liking the new season???? I didn’t know when it was gonna be out but I saw it the other day and I’m stoked!! this is the closest I can get to watching the show for the first time. it’s awesome. also side note- does anyone else just watch the whole series of the plain office then switch to superfans when that’s over then go back???? my boyfriend thinks I’m crazy for it haha but it’s my comfort show as I’m sure it is most of us here too lmfao

submitted by /u/redrumredrum13
[link] [comments]  how is everyone liking the new season???? I didn’t know when it was gonna be out but I saw it the other day and I’m stoked!! this is the closest I can get to watching the show for the first time. it’s awesome. also side note- does anyone else just watch the whole series of the plain office then switch to superfans when that’s over then go back???? my boyfriend thinks I’m crazy for it haha but it’s my comfort show as I’m sure it is most of us here too lmfao submitted by /u/redrumredrum13 [link] [comments]

Read more

Would you do the same? /u/idisappointment69 People Person’s Paper People

Would you do the same? /u/idisappointment69 People Person’s Paper People

If you were in Jim’s place, and your wife was also fearful of moving to another city even though it could be a great opportunity for your family to lead a better life and quite possibly, the life you dreamed of, would you have sacrificed that?

As much as I like her, this thing about Pam really nagged me, how she was always afraid to take risks and leave her comfort zone. I understand it, but it always nagged me, especially when Jim had to sacrifice his dream job. It all turned out well tho, so no harm.

submitted by /u/idisappointment69
[link] [comments]

​r/DunderMifflin If you were in Jim’s place, and your wife was also fearful of moving to another city even though it could be a great opportunity for your family to lead a better life and quite possibly, the life you dreamed of, would you have sacrificed that? As much as I like her, this thing about Pam really nagged me, how she was always afraid to take risks and leave her comfort zone. I understand it, but it always nagged me, especially when Jim had to sacrifice his dream job. It all turned out well tho, so no harm. submitted by /u/idisappointment69 [link] [comments] 

If you were in Jim’s place, and your wife was also fearful of moving to another city even though it could be a great opportunity for your family to lead a better life and quite possibly, the life you dreamed of, would you have sacrificed that?

As much as I like her, this thing about Pam really nagged me, how she was always afraid to take risks and leave her comfort zone. I understand it, but it always nagged me, especially when Jim had to sacrifice his dream job. It all turned out well tho, so no harm.

submitted by /u/idisappointment69
[link] [comments]  If you were in Jim’s place, and your wife was also fearful of moving to another city even though it could be a great opportunity for your family to lead a better life and quite possibly, the life you dreamed of, would you have sacrificed that? As much as I like her, this thing about Pam really nagged me, how she was always afraid to take risks and leave her comfort zone. I understand it, but it always nagged me, especially when Jim had to sacrifice his dream job. It all turned out well tho, so no harm. submitted by /u/idisappointment69 [link] [comments]

Read more

Would Dwight and Angela’s “baby contract” be legal in the U.S.? /u/hekkielol People Person’s Paper People

Would Dwight and Angela’s “baby contract” be legal in the U.S.? /u/hekkielol People Person’s Paper People

So, I’m rewatching The Office and get to the whole “baby contract” situation between Dwight and Angela, where Angela agrees to have Dwight’s child if certain conditions are met. I alway found it to be a weird plot line in their very long will they, wont they relationship. I decided to do some research on the matter to see if the mediatior was right to call it a “solid contract”.

Short answer: absolutely not.

In the U.S., such a contract would be unenforceable on numerous grounds:

Public Policy – Courts won’t enforce contracts that go against public morals or human dignity. Forcing someone to conceive or have a baby.

Right to Privacy/Bodily Autonomy – Constitutionally protected rights mean no one can compel you to use your body in a certain way. Griswold v. Connecticut and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

13th Amendment – It would be a form of involuntary servitude, which is banned. Even if the parties signed willingly, a party cannot contract away such basic rights.

No Specific Performance – Courts will not order a person to perform an act that is personal or intimate in nature, such as conceiving a child.

Lack of Consideration – Contracts must have the parties exchange consideration, something of value. “Having a baby” is not good enough consideration.

I know that the mediator called it a donor contract, but still I think Angela would have never won the case. And no damages should be payed by Dwight.

Any lawers in here or people with different opinions?

submitted by /u/hekkielol
[link] [comments]

​r/DunderMifflin So, I’m rewatching The Office and get to the whole “baby contract” situation between Dwight and Angela, where Angela agrees to have Dwight’s child if certain conditions are met. I alway found it to be a weird plot line in their very long will they, wont they relationship. I decided to do some research on the matter to see if the mediatior was right to call it a “solid contract”. Short answer: absolutely not. In the U.S., such a contract would be unenforceable on numerous grounds: Public Policy – Courts won’t enforce contracts that go against public morals or human dignity. Forcing someone to conceive or have a baby. Right to Privacy/Bodily Autonomy – Constitutionally protected rights mean no one can compel you to use your body in a certain way. Griswold v. Connecticut and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. 13th Amendment – It would be a form of involuntary servitude, which is banned. Even if the parties signed willingly, a party cannot contract away such basic rights. No Specific Performance – Courts will not order a person to perform an act that is personal or intimate in nature, such as conceiving a child. Lack of Consideration – Contracts must have the parties exchange consideration, something of value. “Having a baby” is not good enough consideration. I know that the mediator called it a donor contract, but still I think Angela would have never won the case. And no damages should be payed by Dwight. Any lawers in here or people with different opinions? submitted by /u/hekkielol [link] [comments] 

So, I’m rewatching The Office and get to the whole “baby contract” situation between Dwight and Angela, where Angela agrees to have Dwight’s child if certain conditions are met. I alway found it to be a weird plot line in their very long will they, wont they relationship. I decided to do some research on the matter to see if the mediatior was right to call it a “solid contract”.

Short answer: absolutely not.

In the U.S., such a contract would be unenforceable on numerous grounds:

Public Policy – Courts won’t enforce contracts that go against public morals or human dignity. Forcing someone to conceive or have a baby.

Right to Privacy/Bodily Autonomy – Constitutionally protected rights mean no one can compel you to use your body in a certain way. Griswold v. Connecticut and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

13th Amendment – It would be a form of involuntary servitude, which is banned. Even if the parties signed willingly, a party cannot contract away such basic rights.

No Specific Performance – Courts will not order a person to perform an act that is personal or intimate in nature, such as conceiving a child.

Lack of Consideration – Contracts must have the parties exchange consideration, something of value. “Having a baby” is not good enough consideration.

I know that the mediator called it a donor contract, but still I think Angela would have never won the case. And no damages should be payed by Dwight.

Any lawers in here or people with different opinions?

submitted by /u/hekkielol
[link] [comments]  So, I’m rewatching The Office and get to the whole “baby contract” situation between Dwight and Angela, where Angela agrees to have Dwight’s child if certain conditions are met. I alway found it to be a weird plot line in their very long will they, wont they relationship. I decided to do some research on the matter to see if the mediatior was right to call it a “solid contract”. Short answer: absolutely not. In the U.S., such a contract would be unenforceable on numerous grounds: Public Policy – Courts won’t enforce contracts that go against public morals or human dignity. Forcing someone to conceive or have a baby. Right to Privacy/Bodily Autonomy – Constitutionally protected rights mean no one can compel you to use your body in a certain way. Griswold v. Connecticut and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. 13th Amendment – It would be a form of involuntary servitude, which is banned. Even if the parties signed willingly, a party cannot contract away such basic rights. No Specific Performance – Courts will not order a person to perform an act that is personal or intimate in nature, such as conceiving a child. Lack of Consideration – Contracts must have the parties exchange consideration, something of value. “Having a baby” is not good enough consideration. I know that the mediator called it a donor contract, but still I think Angela would have never won the case. And no damages should be payed by Dwight. Any lawers in here or people with different opinions? submitted by /u/hekkielol [link] [comments]

Read more