So let’s say someone has gone out in broad daylight and killed 100 people, there’s multiple witnesses as well as evidence. Obviously everyone has rights to a lawyer or legal counsel, but are they required to “defend” someone who is clearly guilty?
I understand lawyers are also there to ensure you are treated justly (i.e., given the appropriate amount of time, not being excessively punished, etc) — but what does a lawyer even say in court in instances like these? Other than trying to convince the court he’s mentally ill and should receive a reduced sentence?
submitted by /u/glutenfree_soysauce
[link] [comments]
r/NoStupidQuestions So let’s say someone has gone out in broad daylight and killed 100 people, there’s multiple witnesses as well as evidence. Obviously everyone has rights to a lawyer or legal counsel, but are they required to “defend” someone who is clearly guilty? I understand lawyers are also there to ensure you are treated justly (i.e., given the appropriate amount of time, not being excessively punished, etc) — but what does a lawyer even say in court in instances like these? Other than trying to convince the court he’s mentally ill and should receive a reduced sentence? submitted by /u/glutenfree_soysauce [link] [comments]
So let’s say someone has gone out in broad daylight and killed 100 people, there’s multiple witnesses as well as evidence. Obviously everyone has rights to a lawyer or legal counsel, but are they required to “defend” someone who is clearly guilty?
I understand lawyers are also there to ensure you are treated justly (i.e., given the appropriate amount of time, not being excessively punished, etc) — but what does a lawyer even say in court in instances like these? Other than trying to convince the court he’s mentally ill and should receive a reduced sentence?
submitted by /u/glutenfree_soysauce
[link] [comments]