What Are My Chances for Google L4 After My Tech Rounds? /u/Parathaa CSCQ protests reddit

Hi everyone,

I just completed all the tech onsite rounds for Google L4 (equivalent to SDE2) in India. Here’s my strict self-evaluation based on what happened:

Phone Screen:

  • Solved a Multi-Source BFS Graph problem with all three follow-ups.
  • The recruiter gave super positive feedback, and the interviewer seemed happy with my performance.

Onsite Interviews:

Round 1:

  • Solved the original Graph problem and its follow-up.
  • The interviewer confirmed my approach for the follow-up was correct during the dry run. However, they mentioned my code was a bit complicated due to some extra calculations, which weren’t needed. These didn’t impact time/space complexity, though.
  • Likely Verdict: Lean Hire or Hire if they overlook the complexity issue.

Round 2:

  • Solved the original problem and its follow-up (queue-based design problem).
  • There was a small bug in the follow-up where I forgot to decrement a variable after inserting elements into the queue. The interviewer pointed it out and asked me to find it, but I couldn’t locate it during the interview. Everything else went well, though.
  • Likely Verdict: Hire if the bug isn’t stressed much, otherwise Lean Hire.

Round 3:

  • Solved a Tree problem and two follow-ups.
  • Everything went smoothly with no issues.
  • Likely Verdict: Strong Hire.

Other Highlights:

  • Throughout the rounds, I wrote modular, clean code, discussed my thought process clearly, dry-ran my solutions, and provided accurate time/space complexity.

Googliness Round:

  • This is still pending.

Question:

What do you think my chances are of getting the offer for Google L4 (SDE2)?

Would appreciate your thoughts!

submitted by /u/Parathaa
[link] [comments]

​r/cscareerquestions Hi everyone, I just completed all the tech onsite rounds for Google L4 (equivalent to SDE2) in India. Here’s my strict self-evaluation based on what happened: Phone Screen: Solved a Multi-Source BFS Graph problem with all three follow-ups. The recruiter gave super positive feedback, and the interviewer seemed happy with my performance. Onsite Interviews: Round 1: Solved the original Graph problem and its follow-up. The interviewer confirmed my approach for the follow-up was correct during the dry run. However, they mentioned my code was a bit complicated due to some extra calculations, which weren’t needed. These didn’t impact time/space complexity, though. Likely Verdict: Lean Hire or Hire if they overlook the complexity issue. Round 2: Solved the original problem and its follow-up (queue-based design problem). There was a small bug in the follow-up where I forgot to decrement a variable after inserting elements into the queue. The interviewer pointed it out and asked me to find it, but I couldn’t locate it during the interview. Everything else went well, though. Likely Verdict: Hire if the bug isn’t stressed much, otherwise Lean Hire. Round 3: Solved a Tree problem and two follow-ups. Everything went smoothly with no issues. Likely Verdict: Strong Hire. Other Highlights: Throughout the rounds, I wrote modular, clean code, discussed my thought process clearly, dry-ran my solutions, and provided accurate time/space complexity. Googliness Round: This is still pending. Question: What do you think my chances are of getting the offer for Google L4 (SDE2)? Would appreciate your thoughts! submitted by /u/Parathaa [link] [comments] 

Hi everyone,

I just completed all the tech onsite rounds for Google L4 (equivalent to SDE2) in India. Here’s my strict self-evaluation based on what happened:

Phone Screen:

  • Solved a Multi-Source BFS Graph problem with all three follow-ups.
  • The recruiter gave super positive feedback, and the interviewer seemed happy with my performance.

Onsite Interviews:

Round 1:

  • Solved the original Graph problem and its follow-up.
  • The interviewer confirmed my approach for the follow-up was correct during the dry run. However, they mentioned my code was a bit complicated due to some extra calculations, which weren’t needed. These didn’t impact time/space complexity, though.
  • Likely Verdict: Lean Hire or Hire if they overlook the complexity issue.

Round 2:

  • Solved the original problem and its follow-up (queue-based design problem).
  • There was a small bug in the follow-up where I forgot to decrement a variable after inserting elements into the queue. The interviewer pointed it out and asked me to find it, but I couldn’t locate it during the interview. Everything else went well, though.
  • Likely Verdict: Hire if the bug isn’t stressed much, otherwise Lean Hire.

Round 3:

  • Solved a Tree problem and two follow-ups.
  • Everything went smoothly with no issues.
  • Likely Verdict: Strong Hire.

Other Highlights:

  • Throughout the rounds, I wrote modular, clean code, discussed my thought process clearly, dry-ran my solutions, and provided accurate time/space complexity.

Googliness Round:

  • This is still pending.

Question:

What do you think my chances are of getting the offer for Google L4 (SDE2)?

Would appreciate your thoughts!

submitted by /u/Parathaa
[link] [comments] 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *