But these day many company except those with alot of money, they want full stack devs since they dont need an expert, they want someone who can finish both tasks for maybe 3/4 price of hire both persons.
And In term of career vice, if you want to work for a big company isn’t it better to have only Backend Career?, not just full stack. Because those big company they want the truely expert who spend all their career e.g. on Backend task, especially, if there is critical bug that cost alot of money, their specialist and expereince where htey have seen this similar pattern before. They can fix it fastest, compared to Full Stack Dev who switch between tickets.
—
Let’s take a look at this gaming analogy, where max level is 100
Both people spend 5 years career on coding
- Full stack dev: james,
Skill level
-Backend: lv.70
-Frontend: lv.70
—
2. Backend/Frontend Thomas
-Backend: lv.100
-Frontend: lv.1
Vice versa
—
James would be best match for those start up or mid sized company who pay average-high salary.
While Thomas will be best match for a rich company that really value software development, since troubleshooting bugs is also the most important job. For example OpenAI , they sometimes are down but they get back fast because of a guy like Thomas.
submitted by /u/ballbeamboy2
[link] [comments]
r/cscareerquestions But these day many company except those with alot of money, they want full stack devs since they dont need an expert, they want someone who can finish both tasks for maybe 3/4 price of hire both persons. And In term of career vice, if you want to work for a big company isn’t it better to have only Backend Career?, not just full stack. Because those big company they want the truely expert who spend all their career e.g. on Backend task, especially, if there is critical bug that cost alot of money, their specialist and expereince where htey have seen this similar pattern before. They can fix it fastest, compared to Full Stack Dev who switch between tickets. — Let’s take a look at this gaming analogy, where max level is 100 Both people spend 5 years career on coding Full stack dev: james, Skill level -Backend: lv.70 -Frontend: lv.70 — 2. Backend/Frontend Thomas -Backend: lv.100 -Frontend: lv.1 Vice versa — James would be best match for those start up or mid sized company who pay average-high salary. While Thomas will be best match for a rich company that really value software development, since troubleshooting bugs is also the most important job. For example OpenAI , they sometimes are down but they get back fast because of a guy like Thomas. submitted by /u/ballbeamboy2 [link] [comments]
But these day many company except those with alot of money, they want full stack devs since they dont need an expert, they want someone who can finish both tasks for maybe 3/4 price of hire both persons.
And In term of career vice, if you want to work for a big company isn’t it better to have only Backend Career?, not just full stack. Because those big company they want the truely expert who spend all their career e.g. on Backend task, especially, if there is critical bug that cost alot of money, their specialist and expereince where htey have seen this similar pattern before. They can fix it fastest, compared to Full Stack Dev who switch between tickets.
—
Let’s take a look at this gaming analogy, where max level is 100
Both people spend 5 years career on coding
- Full stack dev: james,
Skill level
-Backend: lv.70
-Frontend: lv.70
—
2. Backend/Frontend Thomas
-Backend: lv.100
-Frontend: lv.1
Vice versa
—
James would be best match for those start up or mid sized company who pay average-high salary.
While Thomas will be best match for a rich company that really value software development, since troubleshooting bugs is also the most important job. For example OpenAI , they sometimes are down but they get back fast because of a guy like Thomas.
submitted by /u/ballbeamboy2
[link] [comments]