My DM flirted with being wet being a condition. If you were wet you had vulnerability to Lightning damage. IT WAS BRUTAL! I do not recommend.
At any rate it got me thinking.
Wet
Whenever a wet creature takes Cold or Lightning damage that damage is increased by 1d6.
Whenever a wet creature takes Fire damage that damage is reduced by 1d6 and the condition ends.
A creature can end the wet condition by taking an action to dry off with a towel, use prestidigitation or spend 10 minutes in a dry location.
What do you think? Worth including, waste of time?
submitted by /u/Syn-th
[link] [comments]
​r/DnD My DM flirted with being wet being a condition. If you were wet you had vulnerability to Lightning damage. IT WAS BRUTAL! I do not recommend. At any rate it got me thinking. Wet Whenever a wet creature takes Cold or Lightning damage that damage is increased by 1d6. Whenever a wet creature takes Fire damage that damage is reduced by 1d6 and the condition ends. A creature can end the wet condition by taking an action to dry off with a towel, use prestidigitation or spend 10 minutes in a dry location. What do you think? Worth including, waste of time? submitted by /u/Syn-th [link] [comments]Â
My DM flirted with being wet being a condition. If you were wet you had vulnerability to Lightning damage. IT WAS BRUTAL! I do not recommend.
At any rate it got me thinking.
Wet
Whenever a wet creature takes Cold or Lightning damage that damage is increased by 1d6.
Whenever a wet creature takes Fire damage that damage is reduced by 1d6 and the condition ends.
A creature can end the wet condition by taking an action to dry off with a towel, use prestidigitation or spend 10 minutes in a dry location.
What do you think? Worth including, waste of time?
submitted by /u/Syn-th
[link] [comments]Â